INLSA-  Professor Tim Noakes

Wilma Stassen –  Health-E News

CELEBRITY Professor Tim Noakes’s popular low-carbohydrate “banting” diet is neither healthier nor better for dropping kilos than a balanced weight-loss diet, according to a Stellenbosch University (SU) study released yesterday.

Published in the international PLOS ONE journal yesterday, the SU study reviewed the result of 19 international scientific trials. As part of these trials, about 3 200 participants were placed either on low-carbohydrate or balanced weight-loss diets. Studies lasted between three months and two years, and measured the diets’ impacts on risk factors related to heart disease, diabetes and cancer.

The study showed that fad banting diets that drastically restricted carbohydrate intake in favour of fats resulted in weight loss by restricting caloric intake – not by lowering the amount of carbohydrates consumed.

“This study shows that when the amount of energy consumed by people following the low carbohydrate and balanced diets was similar, there was no difference in weight loss,” said lead researcher Dr Celeste Naude, from the Centre for Evidence-based Health Care at SU’s Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences.

Based on these findings the Heart and Stroke Foundation South Africa, the Association for Dietetics in South Africa and other health groups are warning the public about the possible health risks associated with banting.

“Decades of research have shown the balanced diet to be safe and healthy in the long term, and along with a healthy lifestyle, is associated with a lower risk of heart disease, stroke, diabetes and certain cancers,” said Heart and Stroke Foundation SA chief executive Dr Vash Munghal-Singh.

“We do not have similar proof that a low-carbohydrate diet is safe and healthy in the long term, and some studies already point towards an increased risk of heart disease and death with low carbohydrate diets. Chronic diseases like heart disease, stroke, cancer and diabetes develop over many years of exposure to risk factors.

“The follow-up of the trials included in the review is no longer than two years, which is too short to provide an adequate picture of the long-term risk of following a low carbohydrate diet. Based on the current

evidence we cannot recommend a low carbohydrate diet to the public.”

Carbohydrates comprise at least 45 percent of a balanced diet. Protein should make up between 20 to 35 percent of daily calories with the remainder being derived from fats.

A balanced weight-loss diet restricts energy intake in each of these categories, while maintaining the recommended balance between carbohydrates, protein and fat.

International research has shown that a balanced weight-loss diet ensures dieters meet nutrient requirements and reduces the risk of chronic diseases.

But Noakes argues that a high fat and protein diet has been known to reduce hunger, leading to less food intake and thus less energy intake. He argues this diet is the easiest to follow. “Unless the diet takes away hunger it will not produce the change in lifestyle necessary to sustain weight loss,” Noakes told Health-e News. “Low carb (diets) take away hunger in a way that no other diet does, that’s why it is the easiest diet to follow and the most effective.”

Noakes says that particularly favourable results are achieved on the low-carbohydrate diet in people with insulin resistance (pre-diabetes), however, the results of the SU trial showed similar results for people with diabetes on both diets.

The Heart and Stroke Foundation SA admits that certain fats, particularly the mono- and polyunsaturated fats found in olive oil, fish and certain seeds and nuts, are beneficial to heart health. But the foundation points out that the fats promoted in Noakes’s popular The Real Meal Revolution cookbook are mostly saturated fats like animal fats such as lard and butter, which have linked to high cholesterol and, in turn, increased heart disease and stroke risks.

The Association for Dietetics in SA also stressed that there was no “ideal” weight loss diet and that individual factors needed to be considered when giving nutritional advice.

According to the association’s spokeswoman, Maryke Gallagher, effective weight loss strategies should take into account personalised factors like health status, physical activity, attitude towards food and stress levels.

“These factors will all affect the outcome of any dietary strategy,” Gallagher said.

ENDS

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

My opinion is to try and find a balance amidst all of this. The one thing every one will agree upon is that the huge amount of sugar we eat is bad for us.  It’s added to just about everything and you have to look long and hard to find products that are sugar free. Having said that, life would be very dull indeed if there were never any sweet treats to enjoy. Dark chocolate is acceptable and loads of low carb baked dessert recipes are coming to the fore. The sugar substitute added to those do not effect your blood sugar level as sugar does.

Everyone will agree, the closer to natural products we get and less processed food is better. No one will contest the nutritional benefits of avocados, olives, salad ingredients and fresh vegetables. Although fruit is loaded with sugar and if you are diabetic, you need to eat it sparingly, it’s better than the sugar in condensed milk!  There are so many good food options that everyone agrees with, it’s becoming easier to choose. The less processed the better.

If I have to sing one song it’s to cut down on sugar.  Even the Bible has something to say about eating too much of it..

Proverbs 25:16

Do you like honey? Don’t eat too much, or it will make you sick!

Be healthy, find the balance, eat when you are hungry, stop when you are full. Get some exercise, reduce stress. Trust God.

That’s what I think & I try and I’m a low carb girl!

God bless you loads!

In His Grip,

Helga xx 🙂

Gratitude Pic…I’m also a Coffee girl…I asked Riana to bring me back Starbucks AND SHE DID!